Appellate Court Remands Plaintiff’s Terminating Sanctions for the Second Time: eDiscovery Case Law — eDiscovery Today by Doug Austin

In Winecup Gamble, Inc. v. Gordon Ranch LP, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Nevada district court erred in imposing terminating sanctions against the plaintiff (counter-defendant-appellant) for Rule 37(e) sanctions and reversed the ruling, vacated the judgment, and remanded for further proceedings before a different judge “[b]ecause the district court has now twice erroneously issued pretrial orders terminating the case”.

Appellate Court Remands Plaintiff’s Terminating Sanctions for the Second Time: eDiscovery Case Law — eDiscovery Today by Doug Austin